Course Information:
| Year-Semester | Course Number | Course Name | Phase | Credits | Hours | Required/Elective | Instructor | Class | Student NO. | Withdraw | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall Semester Year 2026 |
366787 | The History of Chinese Philosophy | 1 | 2.0 | 2 | △ | CHEN, YI | Core Curriculum (III) | 29 | 0 | 人文與藝術向度 |
Course Plan:
| Instructor | CHEN, YI Office Hours | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
chenyi@ntut.edu.tw | |||||||||||
| Last Updated | 2026-08-23 20:12:38 | ||||||||||
| Course Objective | |||||||||||
| Course Schedule (Week 1-16) | |||||||||||
| Flexible Learning (Week 17-18) |
|
||||||||||
| Evaluation and grading policy | |||||||||||
| Materials | All right reserved. Do not reproduce without permission. Foreign-language textbooks:Yes | ||||||||||
| The access to curricular consultation | chenyi@mail.ntut.edu.tw | ||||||||||
| Expanding teaching and resources | ● 參與式創新教學 (Participatory & Innovative Teaching) 強調學生參與與產出,導入翻轉、PBL/專題、設計思考或遊戲化等策略。 Emphasizes student engagement and outcomes by adopting strategies such as Flipped Classroom, PBL (Problem/Project- Based Learning), Design Thinking, or Gamification. | ||||||||||
| The course corresponds to the SDGs | SDG1:消除貧窮(No Poverty) SDG3:良好健康和福祉(Good Health and Well-being) SDG4:優質教育(Quality Education) SDG5:性別平等(Gender Equality) SDG10:減少不平等(Reduced Inequalities) SDG16:和平正義與有力的制度(Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) | ||||||||||
| Does the course incorporate AI | ● 使用生成式AI作為教學過程的輔助工具(Use generative AI tools as an aid to the teaching process) ● 鼓勵學生使用生成式AI工具(Encourage students to use generative AI tools) | ||||||||||
| Note |
1. Confucianism in Week 2-3, Daoism in Week 6-7, egalism in Week 11, and Mohism in Week 13 correspond respectively to SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).
2. The course develops students’ philosophical thinking through textual analysis and issue-based discussions, with classroom performance used as a measure of learning outcomes. This approach corresponds to the second component of Innovative Character Education, “Explanation.” |